The 2012-2013 NHL Season: What We’re All Missing Part 3
October 24, 2012 Leave a comment
Part 3 is now up on the Sportz Broz.
It features the Washington Capitals, Phoenix Coyotes and New Jersey Devils.
Enjoy!
Pete Dombrosky's take on Penn State and Pittsburgh Sports
October 24, 2012 Leave a comment
Part 3 is now up on the Sportz Broz.
It features the Washington Capitals, Phoenix Coyotes and New Jersey Devils.
Enjoy!
October 22, 2012 Leave a comment
The next installment of what we’re all missing in the NHL is now up on the Sportz Broz! This segment features the St. Louis Blues, Boston Bruins, Montreal Canadiens and Vancouver Canucks. Click here to check it out.
October 20, 2012 Leave a comment
Times are tough hockey fans, but when the going gets tough, hockey fans pull the sweater over that adversity’s head and pummel it. Check out the first installment of “What We’re Missing at The Sportz Broz. It features the Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks and Columbus Blue Jackets.
Enjoy.
October 13, 2012 Leave a comment
Before this season, the Toronto Blue Jays, Florida Marlins and Baltimore Orioles all announced some changes to their look before the season. The Marlins completely altered their identity. They are now the Miami Marlins and have new colors, logos, uniforms and a new ball park to boot. The Blue Jays and Orioles simply changed their logos back to similar designs they used in the past.
Without question, tons of money was spent in all three cases so the teams could develop these logos, generate interest and marketing campaigns for them, and ultimately decide if they would help the public perception of those teams. (A friend of mine works for the company that rebranded the Marlins and he informed me that the transition was no small financial or physical undertaking.)
Although the Marlins and the Blue Jays both failed to make the playoffs, the Orioles powered their way into the postseason and lost to the Yankees in the ALDS. Regardless, the 2012 Baltimore Orioles and their revamped logo will be thought of as a winning team, especially compared to most other Orioles teams in recent history.
Ultimately that’s what matters.
In my opinion, the primary goal of a logo change is to associate the new logo with a winning team (and winning tradition) and to be accepted by the fans as a true seal of that franchise, both presently and historically. If both of these criteria are met, then merchandise revenue will go through the roof and people will instantly recognize a symbol and think “winner.”
There are a few “winner” symbols that are recognized across the U.S.: the Yankees’ “NY,” the Detroit Redwings’ winged wheel, and of course, the Pittsburgh Steelers’ triple hypocycloids all come to mind. These are iconic logos long associated with winning, just like the McDonald’s arches is an icon long associated with obesity.
Recently, the success of the Orioles and their new logo got me thinking about the success of the Steel City and its logos.
Pittsburgh has had its fair share of winners throughout its professional sports history. The Steelers have six championships while the Pirates and Penguins have won five and three, respectively. Even without mentioning championships, the Steelers and Pirates are historically winning franchises; the Steelers have a .523 all-time win percentage and the Pirates are at .503 all time. And the Penguins aren’t far behind with an all-time points percentage (points divided by maximum possible points) of .497.
So here’s the question I posed: Where do all the professional Pittsburgh sports logos rank all time in win percentage amongst the three teams?
To answer this question, I keyed in on a few very helpful resources. Using Chris Creamer’s Sports Logos Page – www.sportsLogos.net (“Your virtual museum dedicated to education of the history of sports logos and sports uniforms.”), I was able to identify practically every logo that the Pirates, Steelers and Penguins ever used. There were a few gaps in which the franchises played but no logos are listed, but for the most part the information is relatively comprehensive. Then, I cross-referenced the logo’s years with the statistical data of each team using www.pro-football-reference.com, www.hockey-reference.com and www.baseball-reference.com.
I compiled all the information and boiled it down to an easy-to-read catalogue of black and gold (and red and blue and a surprising array of other colors used in Pittsburgh logo history) for your browsing pleasure. At the bottom of this entry are charts indicating the chronological order of the logos used for each franchise, as well as each logo’s all-time franchise rank and all-time Pittsburgh rank in win percentage. Before those, you’ll find the win percentage ranking, one by one, of all the logos ever used by the Pirates, Steelers and Penguins.
Disclaimer: Before you check out the list, there are a few things you should know. All the information below is based on the primary logo for each team at that time. That doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the logo used on the uniforms or even the logo you were most used to seeing most of the time. All of these franchises have used alternate logos throughout their histories (which you might have thought were the “main” logos), but those are not included in this list.
Secondly, to compare logos across different sports, I used win percentages for football and baseball and points percentage for hockey. They aren’t the same statistic, but both are the most useful in their respective sports to judge the amount of winning the teams had done. Also, ties have a different statistical bearing in the NFL than they do in MLB AND the NHL. Since 1972, the NFL has counted each tie a half a win. So you’re not confused, I counted all ties (even before 1972) into my win percentages for the Steelers.
Finally, I’ve come to the conclusion that I really doubt there is some type of correlation between win percentage and a primary logo. There have been some studies that suggest there is a correlation between uniform colors and winning, but remember, these primary logos didn’t necessarily appear on the uniforms of the teams they represented. I’m no scientist, but I’m guessing the teams in this list with the highest winning percentages probably would have won just as much had they been represented by any other primary logo.
This is not a scientific study that is meant to be broken down and analyzed in terms of WHY certain logos were successful and WHY others were not. I’m just revealing that some WERE and others WERE NOT. Perhaps the Pirates logo from 1908-1909 had magical powers. Or perhaps it was because those years just happened to feature one of the greatest Pirates to ever play baseball. (I’m guessing the latter.)
So why, you ask, did I take all the time and do all the work for this list?
For the sake of fun and curiosity. And because I knew I would uncover some interesting stuff.
Here are some of the fun facts I discovered:
If there’s anything else you notice and I didn’t mention before, feel free to let me know. But above all else…
Enjoy.
October 5, 2012 Leave a comment
By Pat Combs
Driving across Indiana lends itself well to thinking. There’s not a lot out there to distract a driver; this shouldn’t surprise anyone.
http://www.gourmet.com/images/gmtlive/2012/100312/impact-of-2012-drought_608.jpg
( I didn’t actually take the above picture, but you get the point.)
I drove from my place in Lafayette across the border to Champaign, Ill., last Saturday to see my first Penn State football game in nearly two years. I hadn’t seen the Nittany Lions play in person since they beat Michigan in 2010.
It’s safe to say that things have changed since then.
That’s primarily what filled my mind as I made my way through metropolises like Wingate and Veedersburg. As Pete’s story from earlier this week mentioned, he and I each took in a game – or, in his case, games – in “enemy” territory. It’s always been a dream of mine to see as many different college football stadiums as possible, so at least Memorial Stadium could be checked off the list.
You’ll notice that I omit words like “hostile” from this piece. There’s a reason for that – Memorial Stadium and its fans couldn’t have been any more welcoming. Naturally, I was concerned about how Illinois fans would treat opposing fans (namely, me) of an embattled team, but Illini fans were extremely benign.
Almost sleepy.
The worst I saw was a woman sitting in front of me who constantly complained about her team’s play during the game, but she’s an Illinois football fan – how much could she expect? There was also a couple sitting a few rows behind me who seemed like they were straight out of a terrible football-themed comedy. The man yelled “BLITZ!!!” before every play of the first half. Every. Play. His wife yelled “TOUCHDOWNS!!!” only slightly less frequently (her use of the plural form of the word went for naught; Illinois scored just seven points). Other than observing their knowledge of two football words, they seemed to know nothing of the game.
The positive experiences far outnumbered the minor annoyances of BLITZ and TOUCHDOWNS. To start with, I had a terrific seat. A woman and her son had an extra ticket and sold it to me for a very reasonable price. I had gone to the game without tickets, figuring I’d gamble an hour-and-a-half drive rather than pay $50 to see Illinois football (would you?). I spent some time in the Penn State alumni tent and had a pretty good time…seven minutes in, I’d already secured a free Rice Krispies treat and orange juice. Big Ten football demands hearty breakfasts.
While in the tent, I saw an older Penn State fan named Walter. I did not discuss the game with Walter, nor did I even talk to him. I didn’t even introduce myself to him. How did I know Walter’s identity? He was wearing a knitted sweater that had to have been 30 years old with his name emblazoned down the sleeve. If I weren’t a grad student living on a stipend, I would’ve offered him at least $40 for it. Sadly, the lighting in the tent combined with the obvious creepiness of taking a cell phone picture of an old guy’s arm prevented me from obtaining photographic evidence.
Everyone in Champaign (and Urbana, technically the city in which I parked) was beyond friendly. Even the Illini band waved to and cheered for the Blue Band. The parking attendant who took my money wished me luck and told me that the parking lot was full of mostly Penn State fans (she was right). As I walked into Memorial Stadium, I passed a guy selling programs who was more than accommodating with his sales pitch:
“Yinz wanna buy a program?”
Yes, even the fine people of central Illinois are at least proficient in Pittsburghese. One woman responded that she felt at home.
Memorial Stadium itself is a venue more notable for its architecture and history than its atmosphere. It’s a stadium that held many games in which the Illini were led by Red Grange and displays its age well. It would probably be a pretty cool scene should its inhabitants begin holding more meaningful games; I think the fans would be there to provide a strong environment if the stakes were higher than in the current post-Zook era. The stadium has 200 columns ringing its exterior, giving it a pretty cool look. Inside, large banners hung from the rafters display famous former players such as Grange, Dick Butkus and former Steelers legend Matt Cushing. It occurred to me that I was inside the stadium where my favorite Penn State player of all-time, Brian Milne, scored the biggest touchdown of his career to cap one of the great drives in Nittany Lion history.
The game itself was a successful one for myself and other Penn State fans, but my time on the inside of Memorial Stadium wasn’t all that eventful. Aside from a convincing 35-7 Penn State win and the several perplexing chants of “OSKEE-WOW-WOW,” it was actually a pretty dull game.
In some ways, my excursion to Illinois was a bit disappointing. I went to a college football game – a Division I football game! A Big Ten football game! – completely devoid of animosity or even mild fan-inspired intensity. I obviously didn’t want to hear anything disrespectful directed at Penn State fans, but I was looking forward to at least some football-related chiding from the home fans. I wanted competitive banter. I wanted some jawing back and forth. I wanted just a little well-placed, football-specific vitriol.
I found none.
But as a Penn State fan traveling to a foreign stadium, I know how fortunate this situation was. The Illinois fans I encountered were nothing short of classy and I heard not one word from an Illini faithful regarding the events of the past 11 months. Of course, I’m glad I didn’t, because, for at least a few hours, football was about football, even for Illinois fans.
Now all they need to do is have their offense work on making TOUCHDOWN plural.
— Pat Combs is a contributing writer for the Keystone Sports Spot. He is a Penn State alum and current Purdue grad student.